I’ll keep this one brief.
In this newsletter, I am not selling you anything. Every time I speak my mind, I risk offending people and harming my business. Not everyone will agree with me, and of course everyone is entitled to their view. Although I am not a doctor, I do work in the health and wellness industry, and I feel it is right for me to discuss the following, whether it harms my business or not : –
It’s been a few weeks since the authorities permitted the vaccination programme to be extended to 12-17 year olds in the United States of America. A reasonably significant number of pro-vaccine doctors and biomedical professionals opposed the extension to children (as seems to be the case here), but it was authorised anyway. And then the deaths began. The following two paragraphs is a brief extract from an article published on the Children’s Health Defense web site, with direct links to the VAERS web site (the official, USA government supported, Vaccine Adverse Events Registration System) proving the claims therein.
The most recent reported deaths include a 15-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 1498080) who previously had COVID, was diagnosed with cardiomyopathy in May 2021 and died four days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine on June 18, when he collapsed on the soccer field and went into ventricular tachycardia; and a 13-year-old girl (VAERS I.D. 1505250) who died after suffering a heart condition after receiving her first dose of Pfizer.
Other deaths include two 13-year-old boys (VAERS I.D. 1406840 and 1431289) who died two days after receiving a Pfizer vaccine, a 13-year-old boy who died after receiving Moderna (VAERS I.D. 1463061), three 15-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1187918, 1382906 and 1242573), five 16-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1420630, 1466009, 1225942, 1475434, and 1386841) and three 17-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1199455, 1388042 and 1420762).
These are the reports that are logged by the Vaccine Adverse Events Registration System with direct links. Proof! So don’t bother writing to me (at least not on this point) saying I am spreading misinformation, as I will ignore you, since the links above provide incontrovertible documentary evidence, published for all to see, from a ‘quango’* of the American government. It doesn’t get more factual than that!
* A “quango” is a Quasi-Autonomous Non Governmental Organisation, recognised as an official body by the government. An example in the UK is the Office For National Statistics or the Medicine and Healthcare Regulatory Agency.
Now: it is generally recognised that at best 10% of adverse reports are actually logged. As appalling as it may sound, many doctors do not even know of the existence of the Vaccine Adverse Events Registration System, and the same is true over here for the equivalent UK and EU organisations. Even those that do know about it often fail to report adverse results, partly because it’s of no benefit to them to do so.One has to wonder whether it is also in part because they are too busy to waste their time with frivolous details such as their patients being harmed by the treatments they advocate. One study from a few years ago put the reportage figure as low as 1%! I have gone into this too with links to the studies in a previous newsletter, so I am not going to repeat myself, but I think it’s fair to say the reported deaths and adverse reactions are probably only the thin end of the wedge, and of course we are only a few weeks into the children’s vaccination programme, so the results above are just the start.
Now, please bear in mind that children’s risk from dying from COVID-19 are close to zero. I think this is universally agreed upon no matter what side you’re on in this debate. So 99.99% of teenagers are being given these vaccinations in order to ‘take one for the team’ so to speak rather than for their own benefit. Traditionally, it is in the nature of all mammals that parents protect their young. Here though, we are doing the opposite. The children are having an experimental medical procedure, with no long term safety studies completed, which is of no benefit to them (but in a few cases we now know it kills them), in order to protect people of my age and older (assuming of course that it actually works). Is this ethical? Is it fair to do this to our children? Is this compatible with the Hippocratic oath which states “first, (be 100% sure that you) do no harm”, even if we know from what’s happening in the USA that a few children will for sure be killed and injured?
Now that in the UK, the licensing authorities have given the go-ahead for children aged 16-17 to be vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine against COVID-19 on this side of the pond, you will have to make up your own mind what you think. Especially as let’s face it, as soon at that’s done, they will then turn their attention to even younger children.
My view: There has to be a better, more ethical and safer way of improving society than giving children a medical procedure from which they derive no benefit at all, but could be harmed both in the short term where we already know some of the adverse effects, and longer term where we do not. God forbid that any child who has their whole life ahead of them should take one for the team to protect me. It’s not a child’s job to protect me, it’s my job to protect them! And if that makes any teenager (or parent for their child) who do does not wish to have a medical procedure they do not need, as Michael Gove put it “selfish”, I will celebrate and commend their “selfishness”.
Mark G. Lester
Director – The Finchley Clinic Ltd